I am now in a position to respond to the Libertarian blog listed here. It featured the antics of the last Trust I worked at. As everyone will recall, Steve Choong the mean GMC Panellist with dictatorship tendencies decided on colluding with the General Medical Council in the case R v GMC Ex Parte Pal. This collusion wasn't unexpected.
Steve Choong's dirty work was done by Dr Will Monteiro. Will provided a statement to the Royal Courts of Justice signed under a statement of truth for the General Medical Council. He provided no documentary evidence to substantiate his view that I had apparently misinterpreted being "Fired" and it was actually a "Resignation". The reason both parties have fought this issue is because they are both gibbering away due to liability issues.
Will failed to provide a resignation letter and his evidence in court conflicted directly with the documentary evidence [ hard copies]. Nevertheless, the immunity from GMC procedures given to Will and Steve meant that they were both prepared to follow the GMC much like large Pavlov's dogs. In their dislike and hatred for me, what they didn't understand was its impact on the rest of the medical profession :) including them. And this aspect is the most entertaining one to watch. How far will consultants go to shoot a whistleblower down? Well, they will go far enough to take the entire medical profession down with them.
Mark Shaw QC, wealthy barrister for the GMC paraded Monteiro's statement and relied on it :). The statement of course is a selection of manufactured lies. This essentially means that the General Medical Council relied on fibs. They were indeed quite happy to do so. The only conflict of evidence that exists about whether I resigned or was fired is in the mind of the GMC and the Trust. The documentary evidence shows quite clearly that I was fired. There is no debate on this aspect.
Mark Shaw QC knowing very well that his position had become untenable decided to run far away from this topic and exclaimed to the judge that it "wasn't relevant to the point to be assessed". I nearly broke out in laughter following this because it was painful to see a grown man down on his knees after he had sought a 8 week adjournment to rely on this evidence.In his adjournment application, he had guffawed away about how important the resignation/fired point was then deserted it when he was caught with his proverbial pants down. We have to laugh at Mark Shaw QC because he is such a dark minded soul. Some call him the Man with the Heart of Blackstone.
To cut a long story short, Mark Shaw QC having found himself in a huge pit, dug himself further within that pit. Having dug himself further, he decided to withdraw from the point altogether before he fell head first. So after 1.5 years of crowing in court documents about how I had resigned, he decided the point wasn't worth arguing :). To make his side of the fence appear cosmetically robust, he aligned three GMC witnesses [ including Jackie Smith] and Dr Will Monterio to blatantly lie. Apparently, a lie becomes the truth when sprouted from the mouth of a QC. Never seen that effect before but apparently it happens. Of course, Mark Shaw QC doesn't lie, he simply relies on others who do lie. Mark Shaw QC would have read this section of the Perjury Act though
Yes, Dr William Orlando Monteiro in lied in a court of law. That is a fact of life. It isn't my word against his, it is the internal Trust documentation, third party documentation and hard copies that tell us what happened. Monteiro has to be admired for the extent that he is prepared to lie in a court of law. One of these days, he may just be accommodated in his Majesty's wonderful Prisons. Of course, we know he won't be because the GMC will have protected him. They would have to - to rely on a tissue of lies :).
He represented Worcestershire Mental Health Trust and Dr Steve Choong - so I suppose this is all lying by proxy :). I felt that term was apt given the content of the original hapless complaints that were doomed to fail :).
The conclusion from a Employment Chairman [ whose opinion was sought on these matters] is as follows
More from the tales of Worcestershire Mental Health Trust and the GMC. I am narrating this because it is rather similar to the manner in which all Trusts react when the GMC attempts to devour a doctor. Other episodes will include Mark Shaw QC's faux pais, Jackie Smith's admission that no doctor has to initially inform their Trust of a GMC investigation and other entertaining titbits :). Stay tuned.
As time goes by, the General Medical Council continue to become more and more psychopathic. They perceive that the rest of the world misunderstands them but in reality - no one misunderstands them at all. We all know them to be the tin pot, loony, half baked, corrupt, crazy, bonkers,incompetent organization. It isn't only me that holds that view, its hundreds of people in the UK.
Steve Choong's dirty work was done by Dr Will Monteiro. Will provided a statement to the Royal Courts of Justice signed under a statement of truth for the General Medical Council. He provided no documentary evidence to substantiate his view that I had apparently misinterpreted being "Fired" and it was actually a "Resignation". The reason both parties have fought this issue is because they are both gibbering away due to liability issues.
Will failed to provide a resignation letter and his evidence in court conflicted directly with the documentary evidence [ hard copies]. Nevertheless, the immunity from GMC procedures given to Will and Steve meant that they were both prepared to follow the GMC much like large Pavlov's dogs. In their dislike and hatred for me, what they didn't understand was its impact on the rest of the medical profession :) including them. And this aspect is the most entertaining one to watch. How far will consultants go to shoot a whistleblower down? Well, they will go far enough to take the entire medical profession down with them.
Mark Shaw QC, wealthy barrister for the GMC paraded Monteiro's statement and relied on it :). The statement of course is a selection of manufactured lies. This essentially means that the General Medical Council relied on fibs. They were indeed quite happy to do so. The only conflict of evidence that exists about whether I resigned or was fired is in the mind of the GMC and the Trust. The documentary evidence shows quite clearly that I was fired. There is no debate on this aspect.
Mark Shaw QC knowing very well that his position had become untenable decided to run far away from this topic and exclaimed to the judge that it "wasn't relevant to the point to be assessed". I nearly broke out in laughter following this because it was painful to see a grown man down on his knees after he had sought a 8 week adjournment to rely on this evidence.In his adjournment application, he had guffawed away about how important the resignation/fired point was then deserted it when he was caught with his proverbial pants down. We have to laugh at Mark Shaw QC because he is such a dark minded soul. Some call him the Man with the Heart of Blackstone.
To cut a long story short, Mark Shaw QC having found himself in a huge pit, dug himself further within that pit. Having dug himself further, he decided to withdraw from the point altogether before he fell head first. So after 1.5 years of crowing in court documents about how I had resigned, he decided the point wasn't worth arguing :). To make his side of the fence appear cosmetically robust, he aligned three GMC witnesses [ including Jackie Smith] and Dr Will Monterio to blatantly lie. Apparently, a lie becomes the truth when sprouted from the mouth of a QC. Never seen that effect before but apparently it happens. Of course, Mark Shaw QC doesn't lie, he simply relies on others who do lie. Mark Shaw QC would have read this section of the Perjury Act though
"Every person who aids, abets, counsels, procures, or suborns another person to commit an offence against this Act shall be liable to be proceeded against, indicted, tried and punished as if he were a principal offender"But we can overlook that as well because no Queens Counsel would purposefully rely on a Lie, would they?
Yes, Dr William Orlando Monteiro in lied in a court of law. That is a fact of life. It isn't my word against his, it is the internal Trust documentation, third party documentation and hard copies that tell us what happened. Monteiro has to be admired for the extent that he is prepared to lie in a court of law. One of these days, he may just be accommodated in his Majesty's wonderful Prisons. Of course, we know he won't be because the GMC will have protected him. They would have to - to rely on a tissue of lies :).
He represented Worcestershire Mental Health Trust and Dr Steve Choong - so I suppose this is all lying by proxy :). I felt that term was apt given the content of the original hapless complaints that were doomed to fail :).
The conclusion from a Employment Chairman [ whose opinion was sought on these matters] is as follows
"In my view, the party which was responsible for terminating the “employment” relationship between Dr Pal and the Trust, was the Trust. That relationship was not one of employment. Notice of that termination was, it seems clear from the evidence to which I refer above, given by the Trust to xxx on 3 May 2007"
As time goes by, the General Medical Council continue to become more and more psychopathic. They perceive that the rest of the world misunderstands them but in reality - no one misunderstands them at all. We all know them to be the tin pot, loony, half baked, corrupt, crazy, bonkers,incompetent organization. It isn't only me that holds that view, its hundreds of people in the UK.
0 comments:
Post a Comment