As the vast majority of the medical world has no admiration for contemporary art, I decided to study this Scottish masterpiece.
The Filthy Pen has a lot to say about the use of the anglosaxon expletive. This is what the blog says
"Each of today's graffitists has opted to write a single Anglo-Saxon expletive, and to liven up their chosen word by labouring over its style. And what flourishes they’ve applied. Embellished with artful curves and loops, the opportunities to air their creative bents have not been wasted. They may only have had four letters to work with, but they’ve all managed to create mini masterpieces out of their limited resources"
Timothy Jay the researcher on language states
"If all science on language stopped now, we would know very little about dirty word usage or how dirty word usage relates to more normal language use."
If English were...a Germanic language spoken in Northern Delaware, and particularly if it were the language of some indigenous tribe, it is pretty certain that some enterprising anthropologist would long since have recognised and described the subsystem of taboo language contained within it.
So what we find terribly offensive really depends on the social norm. This morning, I woke up to find some comments made by Dr Elizabeth Miller. Here they are :-
"People who are shocked by words alone, as opposed to descriptions of real events, lack experience of life. They belong to the "I didn't like the way he looked at me" rather than the "I didn't want my friend to die in custody" school of thinking.
Reasons for such hypersensitivity might include an overprotected life, an over inflated salary, too many layers between the person and what matters, too much power and too little responsibility.
Words alone are not shocking, only the meaning they convey. Perhaps Dr Scott's words hit home because in that tiny vestigial structure that was once her soul, she recognised a truth.
In the meantime, I believe we should all raise our game and aspire to surpass the literary bar raised by Dr Scott Junior - Dr Rant, it's over to you
For the record, I have had far less controversial posts removed from [Doctors only Website]. All a person has to do is press the "report this post" button, the moderators come scuttling and it instantly disappears, as if by magic. Why it took EP seven days to find the button, heaven only knows!
I resigned from [Doctors only Website] early this year largely for this reason. It is not a safe plaice.
1 comments:
Elizabeth Paice's ability to suddenly get "shocked" is perhaps similar to Graeme Catto's ability to become "delighted" whenever his incompetence and idiocy are exposed. ( For reference go to the GMC web-site and see how many times Catto has been "delighted" in the recent past).
Catto has even recorded a pod-cast full of bull-crap ( which I am sure his sycophants play all the time in their offices, clinics, theatres, wards). This shows the dangers of technology, IT or otherwise, falling into the hands of the unevolved who will abuse it.
And yes, it is remarkable how the London Deanery's own recruitment and training irregularities do not shock Prof Paice.
Post a Comment