
"The Department of Health has written to PCTs stating doctors should not be ‘penalised’ because they are unable to complete their appraisals, after the NHS Appraisal Toolkit was taken offline because of its vulnerability to hackers"
"The move - made in agreement with the BMA and RCGP – has led to huge upheaval in the appraisal system at its busiest time of the year, and could delay the passage to revalidation for those taking part in pilots of the system"
Dr Charles West, a GP Appraiser in Shropshire and parliamentary candidate for the Liberal Democrats, condemned the decision to take the site offline.
‘Technical staff running the system say knowing the potential problem would have allowed them to monitor it for any incorrect use. But the health minister decided the service should be shut down without notice.’
There is of course a different solution, the Department of Health could supply all doctors with free pens, a Department of Health Serial Killer Prevention Folder and some NHS Headed paper, envelope and free postage. It may well be more reliable :).
Sadly, it is clear as the light of day that the Department of Health's Microsoft driven system is not hacker proof and never will be. Microsoft's record has not been wonderful.
Of course, there are people like Gary McKinnon who would probably be able to hack past anything the Department of Health creates. It is good to know that doctors' professional assessments can be accessed by any reasonable hacker anywhere in the world. This will no doubt warm the cockles of every doctor who is sitting there with their vast array of appraisals completed by their medical friends.
Of course, again vast numbers of doctors continue to be asleep. Must be all those late night oncalls and low pay in the NHS because few fail to understand what this admission of a potential security breach means. This is of course just another day in the NHSHIT system.
Read more coverage by the Register here.
2 comments:
I've said it before but it bears repeating here.
My first appraisals were paper based.
Then they were done on line - confidentiality was assured, naturally.
Then they were collated centrally and analysed anonymously - to look for 'patterns' of 'educational needs'.
Then they became identifiable - the better to 'support' revalidation.
If that isn't creep, Heavens knows what is! And, of course, it was only a matter of time before the data got hacked and/or left in car park...
Rita please check your email
Post a Comment