Count Peter Rubin. The Fool at the GMC. Calling the GDC. Please supply a good dentist for immediate fang extraction

Crosses to bare.

Prof Peter Rubin is in serious trouble. Not only is his integrity under question but legions of whistleblowers are threatening to use the case R v General Medical Council Ex Parte Pal 2009 to refer Rubin to the GMC's conduct procedures. Afterall by the GMC's own definition, anything that is capable of misconduct must be dragged through Stream 1 of the Fitness to Practise procedures. The rumours from the past are that Donald Irvine's position at the GMC became untenable when doctors complained about him. Count Rubin is steadily finding that he is not respected amongst the grassroot medical population. Whistleblowers in the NHS trapped within the General Medical Council are not happy at all by Rubin's statement in the BMJ.

Following on from the two pieces on Mobbing [ these can be read here and here] which have not pleased Professor Griffiths, Professor Rubin wrote the following large black lie in the BMJ.

"I want to make clear that any doctor who wants to report genuine concerns will have nothing to fear from the GMC. The GMC emphasises the responsibility of doctors to report their concerns and this is echoed throughout our guidance. In particular Good Medical Practice (2006) states both that doctors should raise concerns about inadequate resources and that they must protect patients from risk of harm posed by a colleague's conduct, performance or health. Raising Concerns (2006) makes clear that provided doctors have been honest, raising a concern is justified even if it turns out to be groundless"

Here is the GMC's own section on Probity.

So let us take a trip down memory lane and view a memo written by the General Medical Council's top henchmen. The GMC of course failed to implement a gagging clause that prevented these documents from seeing the light of day.

"I want to make clear that any doctor who wants to report genuine concerns will have nothing to fear from the GMC" Peter Rubin 2009

So come-on Professor Peter Rubin - answer the above. Tell the public why an investigation was reversed on the whistleblower on the strength of a " typographical error". This goes to show that despite a million degrees, a million titles, Professor Rubin cannot tell the truth . This is of course intellectual corruption. Rubin is covering up the GMC's misdemeanors. In the above case, the concerns on Ward 87 were justified and upheld by two internal hospital reports. The above case ended through a settled court case in my favour. The GMC failed to investigate or take up the concerns related to Ward 87.

During that time, the General Medical Council was labelled as a totalitarian regime by a High Court Judge.

As one commenter on this blog pointed out - Count Peter Rubin needs his teeth extracting each time he spews lies into the media. An immediate call out has been placed with the GDC. Dentists will hopefully be able to attend the General Medical Council complete with Fang Extraction Kit as an emergency.