Secondly, it amazes me that the Peers are paid a fairly good amount of money yet their problem solving ability is terribly poor. This is seen in their responses to many people who write to them. I often wonder why the tax payers fund such haughty arrogant time wasters.
Thirdly, there are many in authority who believe that because they work in the GMC, CHRE, SRA. the NHS Ombudsman or any regulatory body gives them the right to believe that they are in any way intelligent. Of course, few of them are intelligent or analytical. I am not the most intelligent person out but I can problem solve. Actually, most people can problem solve. It is simply that those in authority cannot do so at all. Every day people copy me into their emails to authority and every day I read these emails in despair. Those that use the processes in these organisations fail to understand that they are actually dealing with arrogant dim people employed by these government quangos. They are essentially paid to dismiss complainants. Small people rarely win in this big world.
I am of course immune to insults on my intelligence by these authorities. I believe most people with justified concerns experience this. One method used is to insult the person raising the concerns. I suppose, I have developed the confidence to spot dim people with no insight. It is always fun to test people in authority who are dim. Of course, once you have proven their spectacular dimness, they often escapade down the hatch specially created for them. I often have endless fun on this subject when communicating with the drones at the General Medical Council and of course I win a lot of my arguments there. Other people will have communicated with the NHS Ombudsman or the Health Commission. In my view, other authorities are not quite as fun as the General Medical Council. Although their super regulator, the CHRE, are probably coming in at number 2. The CHRE though are more bungling dimwits with a total lack of insight. The organisation is generally filled with people who sit around looking pretty and get paid. The GMC has developed their approach to complainants as an artform of obstructive behaviour.
James Landon is probably right about the system - it doesn't work. It is designed to fail all victims and there is no point approaching it. There is a disintegration of society, one that shows us a lack of accountability. Due to this feedback failure, systems are gradually failing and I am not quite sure if anyone can do anything about it. It is in Nu Labour's interest to ensure all these system fail. No doubt, it may be the reason why dim people are employed by these organizations. The dimness is special, it is drone-like dimness with an inability to think laterally. As David Southall once said, his border collie had more intellect than the Chief Exec of the GMC.
1 comments:
;-)
M.C.
Post a Comment