
I have been thinking about a lot of things of late. One of the issues to contemplate is your place in the whistleblowing world. I discovered that the medical establishment had many expectations of me - one was not to whistleblow. It isn't polite apparently. The next expectation is that while an aberrance is accepted, I should now be drawn into line and neatly fit into the fold. The UK's medical establishment can accept aberrance, they can accept that " as a young doctor I didn't know better" but they can't accept the fact that I stand by me actions and I don't give a flying F what they think I should do. I see the rebel trait extracted from many people - Sam Everington, Aneez Esmail and others. It is as if the vampires have landed and extracted their radical side. People can accept a lot in exchange for an understood silence. Essentially, people are neutralised in this way.
The General Medical Council frequently neutralises people. It is a very common way of ensuring there is little challenge to them. Their human rights violations are not recognised as yet but they will be in the fullness of time. It is a telling sign when two mothers of doctors harassed by the GMC are now dead. Of course, the GMC would say that " people die". Sure people die but there is no doubt that the GMC speeds up the process for people. Elizabeth Miller is right about suicides at the GMC. Those working at the GMC are quite happy to knock doctors off the edge. When they die by hanging themselves, the GMC will guffaw and say " Ah we told you they were mad in the first place". That is of course their attitude because they follow the Debretts line of etiquette - to be polite, to have a pristine appearance but to have their special way of ending life. The dead don't speak of course. That is rather convenient for the GMC.
There have always been various efforts to neutralise me but I have never succumbed to them. I learned quite sometime ago that it is important to be your own person, to be independent, to be answerable to no one .I understand that being a woolly sheep just does not suit my street credit. Besides, why do I want to be poncying around with a book on my head. Does it make me better as a person or does it make me acceptable to certain circles. Then do I really want to belong to those circles of fakery? The answer of course is "No I don't".
Besides, the shameless Debretts lady above should get a wonderbra like me then all her assets wouldn't be popping out around everywhere! Honestly! Just goes to show that posh bints just don't understand that good uplifts are a vital asset for any girl. You have to have gone to a comprehensive school for that kind of education :).
[ Warning - Due to a collapse, Dr No will be absent. He was unable to cope once shown the above picture. He is currently giving considered thought on how to grapple with the dual problem].

3 comments:
Dr No would like to assure anyone and everyone that he is very much present. The posh bint is not so much in need of a wonderbra as a surgical corset to straighten that nasty scoliosis. And - as any decent gel knows - you don't snuffle oysters - you throw your head back and slide them in, thereby achieving the twin seductions of a long slender neck, with the clavicular arrow pointing downwards, and an engaging forward thrust of one's own bi-valvular assets.
I'm glad you didn't take the matter into hand Dr No.
Diagnostic criteria for me:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2005/nov/13/observercashsection.theobserver1
And as I am not a man, my faults are even bigger! I have to complain to GMC on these grounds as well, in three colours, and in all forms of communications in case they do not receive it.
Post a Comment