Ward 87: Crazy Bengali Parents

Sunday, 7 December 2008

Crazy Bengali Parents

I spotted this in the Telegraph and had to write about it. Usual story of NHS GP happily functioning in England being mistreated by her parents. The lady is now being held captive. Is this better or worse than being at the London Deanery?! Well, I guess not or was that just in poor taste? I never understand why Bengali parents educate their children in England then expect them to do what they want ie marry someone short who eats masses of beetle nut and can only have sex in one position. Seriously, these are serious issues. These crazy Bengali parents need to understand that if they want their precious little virgin girls to have arranged marriages, they need to

1. Deny them all education
2. Remove their ability to THINK
3. Ensure they are obedient from the start.

NOT - give them a public school education in the UK, a University qualification, create their ability to THINK then assume they will simply "obey".

As a Bengali gulab jamun eater, if I had agreed to a silly arranged engagement, I would have a screw loose in my head. The point about this girl and her predicament is this, she did nothing to prevent it initially and allowed the situation to escalate. Parents who are dysfunctional tend to go a bit potty if they are not set boundaries from the outset. I think Bengali children have to understand that they can't please the world and its goldfish. In the end, you have one life, you live it for yourself and no one else.

This GP has gone missing in Bangladesh. No one gets found in that lawless country. It is a bit like getting lost in India. Missing people stay missing.

As for arranged marriages, I have known many to happen in the UK because asian girls feel pressurised by tradition. I guess this is due to a serious confusional state about identity. Girls are torn between the freedom of England and living up to their parents idea of having a husband with 3 Mercedes Benz and 4 Platinum American Express cards and who is a systems analyst. So what is a systems analyst again?!!! Seriously who wants to spend years being the dutiful wife when there is a world out there?

It is true that one of my friends married a horrid man who was found for her. He owned a corner shop and raped her daily. In the end, he suddenly died of food poisoning. Now no one will apparently marry her and her life is apparently shattered??!! Really?! The other friend went with me to a reading of Meera Syal and spoke to her after the show. Yes, she did indeed insult Meera for marrying an English guy and crowed away about how she had dumped her English boyfriend [ who was in love with her] to do the right thing via tradition. She spent the rest of her time in regret.

As for me - it is one man, he is a English guy and a fabulous one at that. I am going to marry him one day by the sea at Lizards Point or Hawaii. He is the one who stands by me in the hail, snow and rain and never lets go. I know that no Bengali man would ever do that. Most Bengali men still have not evolved away from clutching to their mother's skirts. So, essentially you can't see them coping with a Bengal Tiger.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

About The Author

There is a lot of things most people can say about me but in reality I am NHS Whistleblower. In 1998, I followed the guidance set out in Good Medical Practice[GMC] and raised concerns about substandard care on Ward 87 North Staffordshire NHS Trust. I also raised concerns about the large number of Midlands Hospitals covered by West Midlands NHS Executive in 1999. Following the recordings of the HSMR scores, only Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust spiked their figures. This was due to the inordinately high death rates. These deaths could have been prevented had the government acted in 1999. There are many other hospitals with equally high death rates but 1000s have not raised the HSMR scores. The Mid Staffordshire Inquiry shows poor standards that are similar to many hospitals in the Midlands [particularly Distinct General Hospitals]. They were also the identical to the concerns raised by me in 1999, many years before.

In 2010 the CQC finally admitted that North Staffordshire had "significantly high mortality" in the years I raised concerns.

This blog follows my adventures as a whistleblower. It was written between 2008-2010. It seeks to present what the media have never done. I also aim to discuss a number of medical issues important in the NHS today. A short account of my experiences is presented here.

Essentially, I raised concerns in 1998, locally then to all the authorities, the GMC, Department of Health and Trust attempted to say there was no substance to my concerns. In 2005, I discovered that all authorities had concealed the 1998 and 2001 internal reports that verified my concerns. This is a brief step by step summary of the events related to Ward 87.

Between 2000-2002, the General Medical Council conducted a "discreet inquiry" into my Fitness to Practice. I was never told of this investigation until I discovered quite by accident following a subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998. The GMC were subjected to litigation by me due to the illegal investigation and repeated leaks of prejudicial information to potential employers. They were beaten in court following the first litigation of its kind. The GMC settled the case in favour of me. During litigation, the GMC subjected me quite severe harassment by revolving door vexatious complaints - 2 in total. I was cleared of all of them. I was never subjected to any Fitness to Practise hearings. All complaints were thrown out at case examiner's stage despite the GMC's malevolent intentions.

The GMC subsequently erased me from the Register for non payment of subscription fees. It should be emphasized that I was never sanctioned or struck off has speculated by some bloggers. In total, I have been subjected to 4 years of complaints that had no relation to my clinical work. This has had catastrophic consequences to my work as a doctor and eventually caused the assassination of my references in 2007.

This led to the test case R v General Medical Council Ex Parte Pal with the intention of defining the definition of potential misconduct and preventing vexatious complaints against doctors. The complaints were made by Penny Mellor and her associate Fiona Wollard [ niece of Professor Sir Charles George].

While permission was granted by a judge with Employment Law experience, the final hearing was lost courtesy of Justice Sir Andrew Collins who made various statements. One was that the GMC was free to rule differently on two separate cases with exactly the same facts and the other was to widen the analysis of misconduct to include conduct outside the profession. Justice Sir Andrew Collins has sat on numerous cases related to the GMC. He has often failed to declare that his brother Dr Mark Collins was once prosecuted by the GMC for alliances in Clapham Common. Details of this can be read here.

The two diametrically opposite analysis of misconduct was also discovered following the GMC's submission to R v General Medical Council Ex Parte Remedy UK. Essentially, one analysis appears to be used for some foreign doctors and a different more lenient definition is used for establishment doctors such as Liam Donaldson. The GMC were essentially caught red handed touting two different analysis of misconduct in two cases. This discrepancy is currently being investigated by both the CHRE and the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

The defenses to all these cases have taken up 52 files. By comparison, the GMC refused to investigate the doctors on Ward 87 despite the fact that their conduct was directly related to clinical work. They continue to work in various positions in the UK. No one was held accountable despite 2 reports verifying my concerns. Moreover, the Health Commission refused to conduct a broader data study in relation to the Ward 87. The GMC and Ombudsman refused to inform the patients on the Ward of the 1998 and 2001 Reports. The Sentinel newspapers refused to feature a legitimate advert.

In 2009, after discussion with Dr Phil Hammond, he wrote an excellent piece in Private Eye. While the media have provided little or no support for these issues, I am indebted to my fellow bloggers - Dr Rant, The Jobbing Doctor, Dr John Crippen and Witchdoctor. This blog exists to protect other doctors who I hope will never tread the path of whistleblowing. It is a path paved with injustice. It also serves to show the public that they cannot legitimately expect doctors to raise concerns in such a dangerous terrain. This indeed places patient safety in great jeopardy.

This blog ended in February 2010 as it was unlikely that I would ever return to medicine. I have also decided to end this particular saga here. I hope this blog will educate, entertain and remind the public that whistleblowing is a dangerous escapade and no junior doctor has treaded the same path as I have for a reason. The terrain is unsafe and always has been. I would say that I have been relatively unsupported in my journey through whistleblowing but singlehandedly I have been able to undercover evidence and establish some very important issues regarding the dangers of whistleblowing. I have ceased to respond to the media but I am always very happy to discuss matters with the public.

Ward 87

Pages

Sunday, 7 December 2008

Crazy Bengali Parents

0 comments:

About The Author

R v General Medical Council Ex Parte Pal 2009

Index

Important Judgments

Dr Pal's Legal Review

Blog Archive

Followers

Rita Pal reads

Search This Blog