Nick Cleggover. The Cosmetic Full Monty From Sheffield

If you ain't got it up there.
Just flaunt what's down here.

I find Nick Cleggover fascinating. He is so well turned out, you can't imagine him having his hair ruffled at all. Indeed, you feel like going up to him and saying " Come on Nick, roughen up like a true Northerner". Nick though is clean cut, well turned out and probably has his shirts starched. He is the bad boy turned good from the Liberal Democrat Party who won the Leaders Debate on Sky. I wasn't surprised he won the Leaders Debate. He argues well and always has done. I have always said he had potential. Mind you when you look at the competition with Mr Hug a Hoodie and Mr Scottish Pancake, you really start to understand why Cleggover ended up being the winner.

Not so long ago, I found out that Nick didn't quite stick to his party's word. There was always so much razzmatazz about protecting whistleblowers. It was of course all for show. I know this because he has the same traits as most politicians. Cleggover likes being in the spotlight. He should - he looks like a 1950s clean shaven movie star there.

Then I have a profound dislike of MPs. I often find them pointless, useless and ineffective. Nick though is good to look at. It is no secret I like looking at devilishly handsome men but that habit only happened because the GMC produced such ugly barristers. After Mark Shaw QC, anyone looks good :).

Nick though has limited depth. I know he means well but when push comes to shove, he doesn't quite cut it on the constructive dance floor. Nick emailed Baroness Ludford for me which was his token service for the whistleblower kind. She in turn stated that she could not represent me and completely misunderstood what was being asked of her. It stopped at that. There was no follow-up by Nick nor was there any consideration of the issues I had raised.

Nick below gives me tea and sympathy. Of course, that's not what I needed at the time. I had asked the Liberal Democrat Party to support the concept of protection for whistleblowers.

So I did what I had to do myself - because in this world, if you are going to do anything, never rely on an MP - just get it done on your own. Nick didn't have the intellectual depth or time to grasp the various concepts regarding the General Medical Council or whistleblowing or anything really. I eventually gave up.

We really have to leave it there because Cosmetic Nick cannot help who he is. I do though wish Nick well and I think if he isn't intellectually taxed too much, he should do quite well. He comes from a upbringing where he intellectualizes about many issues but is completely impractical - possibly due to inexperience or perhaps he hopes no one will notice. Actually, who would, women are so bowled over by his looks, its difficult to see anything else. I frequently get dizzy. He may not have the goods at the centralised data centre of his brain - but he has the cosmetics and I don't have high expectations of any Member of Parliament.

As long as he looks good, I am not complaining at all. Sex appeal sells and while he may not persuade me to vote for him, I may just be interested in his type of politics - that depends on whether the Liberal Democrat's strategic policy is to have their team do the Full Monty Striptease. Nick is from Sheffield afterall :).

Letter from Nick to Rita :)

Dr Rita Pal

dr.ritapal@googlemail.com


14 August 2009 Pal001/1


Dear Dr Pal

Thank you for your email concerning whistleblowing and the manner in which the GMC treated you.

I must first clear up a misconception that may have been created by Dr Varma in his email to you. I have indeed written to Mr Hind of the Charity Commission to ask for his comments on some of the points made by Dr Varma on the charitable status of the GMC - as I informed him – but did not ask for its charitable status to be reviewed. I would welcome further information on the matter first.

As you may know my Liberal Democrat colleague Norman Lamb MP has raised a number of concerns relating to the workings of the GMC particularly in relation to the length of time it takes for many cases to be heard by it. However, the GMC will lose its power to discipline its members in 2011 so some progress has been made on refining its powers. I hope you also consider the creation of an Office of the Health Professions Adjudicator to take over the ‘judge and jury’ function of the disciplinary process leaving the GMC with the prosecution function as progress.

I was sorry to learn of your own experiences in the City General Hospital in Stoke-on-Trent. I have taken the liberty of forwarding your email to the office of my colleague Baroness Sarah Ludford, MEP for London. While I cannot say at this stage whether it would be possible to grant your request Baroness Ludford has experience of dealing with such issues and may be able to offer useful advice at least.

Yours sincerely

NICK CLEGG MP

Just for all the girls -
This is what the Liberal Democrats Should do To Win My Vote!
Proper Northen Lads from Sheffield.