
More detailed reporting on NHS Behind the Headlines.
I was reading Dr John Crippen late last night. He featured a excellent annotated version of the Oxfordshire Mail starring Dr Dipstick himself.
The article stated
"Each of the country's 40,000 general practitioners and 120,000 hospital doctors have been listed on iwantgreatcare.org and in its first day thousands of patients logged on to give their opinions"
The Oxford Mail went onto say
"Dr Bacon, 41, of Shipton-under-Wychwood, has taken a sabbatical and said he spent the last year planning the website, talking to doctors, the Department of Health, patient groups and the General Medical Council"We assume one of the patient groups were the " Ghost Drive" - Taking Your Revalidation Into a Different Realm.
As a drive to make up for the doctors thrown out during the MMC fiasco, the White Paper from the Department of Health has suggested that Neil Bacon hire mediums to reconnect with doctors in the afterlife. Mark Shaw QC argued that it was essential to hold dead doctors on the GMC database under the Medical Act 1983 to extract subscription funds. Dr Neil Bacon extrapolated this idea and told the GMC that "we cannot have doctors running around in the afterlife haunting everyone without revalidation". Graeme Catto agreed to his proposal that iwantgreatcare.org should assess dead doctors. As the president was in the same speciality as Dr Neil Bacon, he appreciated what a Dipstick was used for and wholeheartedly agreed to any ideas proposed by Dr Neil Bacon [no matter how stupid they were]. Graeme Catto stated that this was " acceptable clinical risk".
What I want to ask is this, how many years sabbatical is Bacon going to take? Using one dipstick a year for our renal physician [ex] isn't going to do much for his revalidation. We assume all our comments are going to be printed out at the GMC for Neil Bacon's revalidation file. Yes, the GMC should ensure they keep printing away as there is a entire cyberworld full of Bacon Fry. I like the way, Dr Bacon and Lord Darzi are not on iwantgreatcare.org but dead doctors are! Neil Bacon's mate and GMC bod, Prof Chris Bulstrode is up there preening away at 98 percent. We all know about Chris Bulstrode and his close project partner Dr Bacon don't we? Bulstrode talks too much and attends too many meetings. Has he ever done anything useful at the General Medical Council? If he did, we wouldn't have such a psychopathic organisation. Anyway, having been pressured by moi on a number of websites, Bulstrode has finally broken his silence and admitted to his sins. The Jobbing Doctor has the latest news.
Apparently, he is a "He is an ardent supporter of this site, and a neighbour and friend of Dr Neil Bacon". Oh come come Prof Bulstrode, tell them all how you have been working on this internet project with Neil Bacon. Tell them how you admitted it in a recent meeting witnessed by a large number of people. We can't be all shy when it comes to the real crunch can we Chris? All those years at the GMC must have taught you about disclosure of your conflicts in the members Register of Interests. Has Chris heard of this Register? Well, I have but that is because I read.
Jobbing Doctor quips "This is yet another example of a surgeon straying outside their comfort zone of cutting, stitching, screwing, drilling and plumbing people; he lacks insight into human behaviour, he feels that it is all very simple, and it isn't"
This comment amused me. Neil Bacon obviously directs his remarks to Dr Crippen, Witchdoctor, Ferret, Jobbing Doctor and of course me.
"There's a noisy minority who don't see the benefits of progress here, but a far, far larger number of doctors from all levels, primary care and seconday care, junior and senior, who are saying it’s fantastic, this will help me and it will help the patients themselves,' he said.And what a minority we are eh. Rather more intelligent than the average bear.
In my mailbox the number of people thinking it's a great idea outnumber those who don't by roughly seven or eight to one.' [Pulse 15th July 2008]"
Written by She Who Shall Not Be Named :) [or so I am told].
Amazing what the Data Protection Act 1998 can achieve :)
2 comments:
Dear Dr Pal
Just a note from John Spencer to say 'thanks' for your lovely comments about me on your web site.
You probably know more than most that even a single voice raised in support of a whistle-blower means such a lot.
How you have managed to keep your strength up for so long (I've been reading about you!) I don't know.
Somtimes our difficulty is that our stories are SO incredible people chose not to believe them because to believe them would be to turn our world upside down.
You may be pleased to know that I have some pretty damning evidence against the GMC and BMA in all this. I thought when they heard my evidence they would jump to protect their members but they seem to have jumped to protect Virgin instead.
I have an employment tribunal and I think if I get my day in court there will be some fun.
Like you I had trouble with lawyers.
Four different law firms have refused to accept my employment tribunal because of a 'conflict of interest' and one lawyer actually agreed to have a case conference call with me and Virgin's top lawyer and then found out she was 'too busy' just before the phone call so dropped my case!
When I did get to speak to a lawyer I spent £1500 only for him to say he thought my tribunal would fail so, like you, I opened the law books (well Google in my case) and I am pretty sure he was talking rubbish - we will see.
Thanks again - if my case does get any media profile I will send some of it your way!
Cheers
John Spencer
John
I know nothing of your story, but I've just read your comment here.
I just wanted to say that whatever your whistleblowing fight, if it's legal, decent, honest and truthful I'll stand up and be counted on your side too.
Trouble with 'Wibbling' is that you feel so isolated, in a vile, Kafkaesque situation. But we're not alone...I'm meeting more and more decent, sane, normal people whose consciences have impelled them to Wibble as a last resort.
Shame on the lawyers. You're right. An attentive, intelligent lay person can work their way through the law books (caution needed with some apparently common or garden expressions that to law folks take on very specific meanings, but a piece of the wet stuff generally).
Do you have a blog or website where we can follow your success?
Best wishes
Deb
Post a Comment