Ward 87: Dr Rant is having a blonde hair day :)

Tuesday, 16 September 2008

Dr Rant is having a blonde hair day :)

Ranting Blonde Today

My apologies in advance to all blondes the world over. Dr Rant is having a blonde hair day today.

Now, Rant has written a post about supporting doctors suffering injustices.

Rant says

" I'm none too fucking impressed with my fellow bloggers or the mainstream either. Throughout the Scot Junior crisis only a tiny handful of bloggers (Witch Doctor and Rita Pal's blogs spring to mind) made any real effort on the story. There should have been an international outcry about the abuses that took place in Highland, and continue to take place across the NHS"

Rant misses out the most IMPORTANT MAN in BLOGGING WORLD - Just as dastardly handsome as Dr Rant is the THEJOBBINGDOCTOR.

The Jobbing Doctor is well cool. I read JD's blog every day. In fact, I often wish men my age were like JD. JD, Witchdoctor, I and Dr Rant have tirelessly coordinated a campaign for Dr Scot Jnr. Do we care that Dr Scot Jnr is sounding like an ungrateful toad - we don't! All we care about is the fact that team effort resulted in success. JD has supported all of us -providing daily bitesized critiques of the injustices within the NHS. JD is intelligent, classy and superbly talented. Yes, fine I admit it, I fancy his writing.

I was shocked at Dr Rant's blonde moment. How could he miss out JOBBING DOCTOR.?

If I was next to Dr Rant, I would of course persuade him gently :) to add JD to his blog post :). If that didn't work, he would simply have to be tied in a corner with at least three wonderbras until he coughed up his passwords - so I could add JD to the blogpost. It is true that we would hear an expletive or two or even three. I think all women know how to silence Dr Rant :) and I am no exception.

So for all those women out there, while Dr Rant exudes sex appeal, Jobbing Doctor exudes romantic appeal. JD is indeed much like a fine champagne. I am positive the Old Sage Witch will have fallen head over heels for JD as well. This is the reason, the Old Sage Witch has been a little unsteady on her pins and is suffering from atrial flutter. Who can blame her eh.

So if I flutter my eye lashes and look deeply into Dr Rant's eyes, will he add JD to his list? Of course, he won't - just like those annoying Highland Surgeons who haven't even sent me a box of shortbread never mind a picture of them in their kilts *sigh* :).

1900 - Following some gentle persuasion over a candlelit cyberdinner - Dr Rant added JD to his blog :)

0 comments:

Post a Comment

About The Author

There is a lot of things most people can say about me but in reality I am NHS Whistleblower. In 1998, I followed the guidance set out in Good Medical Practice[GMC] and raised concerns about substandard care on Ward 87 North Staffordshire NHS Trust. I also raised concerns about the large number of Midlands Hospitals covered by West Midlands NHS Executive in 1999. Following the recordings of the HSMR scores, only Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust spiked their figures. This was due to the inordinately high death rates. These deaths could have been prevented had the government acted in 1999. There are many other hospitals with equally high death rates but 1000s have not raised the HSMR scores. The Mid Staffordshire Inquiry shows poor standards that are similar to many hospitals in the Midlands [particularly Distinct General Hospitals]. They were also the identical to the concerns raised by me in 1999, many years before.

In 2010 the CQC finally admitted that North Staffordshire had "significantly high mortality" in the years I raised concerns.

This blog follows my adventures as a whistleblower. It was written between 2008-2010. It seeks to present what the media have never done. I also aim to discuss a number of medical issues important in the NHS today. A short account of my experiences is presented here.

Essentially, I raised concerns in 1998, locally then to all the authorities, the GMC, Department of Health and Trust attempted to say there was no substance to my concerns. In 2005, I discovered that all authorities had concealed the 1998 and 2001 internal reports that verified my concerns. This is a brief step by step summary of the events related to Ward 87.

Between 2000-2002, the General Medical Council conducted a "discreet inquiry" into my Fitness to Practice. I was never told of this investigation until I discovered quite by accident following a subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998. The GMC were subjected to litigation by me due to the illegal investigation and repeated leaks of prejudicial information to potential employers. They were beaten in court following the first litigation of its kind. The GMC settled the case in favour of me. During litigation, the GMC subjected me quite severe harassment by revolving door vexatious complaints - 2 in total. I was cleared of all of them. I was never subjected to any Fitness to Practise hearings. All complaints were thrown out at case examiner's stage despite the GMC's malevolent intentions.

The GMC subsequently erased me from the Register for non payment of subscription fees. It should be emphasized that I was never sanctioned or struck off has speculated by some bloggers. In total, I have been subjected to 4 years of complaints that had no relation to my clinical work. This has had catastrophic consequences to my work as a doctor and eventually caused the assassination of my references in 2007.

This led to the test case R v General Medical Council Ex Parte Pal with the intention of defining the definition of potential misconduct and preventing vexatious complaints against doctors. The complaints were made by Penny Mellor and her associate Fiona Wollard [ niece of Professor Sir Charles George].

While permission was granted by a judge with Employment Law experience, the final hearing was lost courtesy of Justice Sir Andrew Collins who made various statements. One was that the GMC was free to rule differently on two separate cases with exactly the same facts and the other was to widen the analysis of misconduct to include conduct outside the profession. Justice Sir Andrew Collins has sat on numerous cases related to the GMC. He has often failed to declare that his brother Dr Mark Collins was once prosecuted by the GMC for alliances in Clapham Common. Details of this can be read here.

The two diametrically opposite analysis of misconduct was also discovered following the GMC's submission to R v General Medical Council Ex Parte Remedy UK. Essentially, one analysis appears to be used for some foreign doctors and a different more lenient definition is used for establishment doctors such as Liam Donaldson. The GMC were essentially caught red handed touting two different analysis of misconduct in two cases. This discrepancy is currently being investigated by both the CHRE and the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

The defenses to all these cases have taken up 52 files. By comparison, the GMC refused to investigate the doctors on Ward 87 despite the fact that their conduct was directly related to clinical work. They continue to work in various positions in the UK. No one was held accountable despite 2 reports verifying my concerns. Moreover, the Health Commission refused to conduct a broader data study in relation to the Ward 87. The GMC and Ombudsman refused to inform the patients on the Ward of the 1998 and 2001 Reports. The Sentinel newspapers refused to feature a legitimate advert.

In 2009, after discussion with Dr Phil Hammond, he wrote an excellent piece in Private Eye. While the media have provided little or no support for these issues, I am indebted to my fellow bloggers - Dr Rant, The Jobbing Doctor, Dr John Crippen and Witchdoctor. This blog exists to protect other doctors who I hope will never tread the path of whistleblowing. It is a path paved with injustice. It also serves to show the public that they cannot legitimately expect doctors to raise concerns in such a dangerous terrain. This indeed places patient safety in great jeopardy.

This blog ended in February 2010 as it was unlikely that I would ever return to medicine. I have also decided to end this particular saga here. I hope this blog will educate, entertain and remind the public that whistleblowing is a dangerous escapade and no junior doctor has treaded the same path as I have for a reason. The terrain is unsafe and always has been. I would say that I have been relatively unsupported in my journey through whistleblowing but singlehandedly I have been able to undercover evidence and establish some very important issues regarding the dangers of whistleblowing. I have ceased to respond to the media but I am always very happy to discuss matters with the public.

Ward 87

Pages

Tuesday, 16 September 2008

Dr Rant is having a blonde hair day :)

0 comments:

About The Author

R v General Medical Council Ex Parte Pal 2009

Index

Important Judgments

Dr Pal's Legal Review

Blog Archive

Followers

Rita Pal reads

Search This Blog