Aunty Eats Fried Bacon

Politically Correct.

There are many problems with the BBC. The first current problem is the Ofcom Investigation into Jonafan Woss and Mr Brand. In my view, its all a load of rubbish and everyone should take their balls and bats home and stop taking life so seriously.

Boys will be boys and Woss apologised.Clearly, the public want their scalps on a fire. If they got half as excitable about the poor quality NHS, we might even have an improvement in the system.

Aunty Beeb received more than 10,000 complaints showing us all that those in the UK care more about a silly prank and some bad language than they do about the system around them. Suspension seems to be the rage these days as it was with Dr Scot Jnr. It seems that every employer is PC. It says something about the times we live it, it says that the media are more concerned about a prank gone wrong rather than those who compromise patient care. This was just an observation.

Witchdoctor Reports Neil Bacon's affair with the BBC. The BBC have again made the wrong call. Mind you, the BBC keeps making the wrong call. At least one doctor [ Mr T] took the BBC to task for their shoddy reporting. Indeed, their recent embarrassment in court cost them an arm and a leg. This is not the first time Panorama have been in serious hot water. John Sweeney their reporter was in hotwater over a complaint made by a paediatrician to Ofcom. Nevertheless, he went onto influence a case while it was under appeal.

So as we can see, the quality of choice by Aunty Beeb seems to have fallen considerably. This is why they hail Bacon as their devine choice to speak on "patient issues". He cared so much about patient rights that he left these comments on his ex forum.

In an earlier message, written on the 19th November 2003, Dr Woodman confessed to having himself been the subject of two official complaints, "with a 50:50 split result!" He said, "For the two years that each took to sort out I found life hell." Speaking of a complaint against him that was dismissed, he added, "When the complaint is thrown out (and thrown out again after the patient appeals) you can't even go round and burn his house down!"

This is what Bacon states

"We’ve got to remember we’re talking about people who’ve grown up now making decisions and reading reviews from other users, reading ratings when they buy a washing machine, booking a holiday. And yet we ask them to take their child to hospital or put their life in the hands of someone without seeing the comments from other people.”

This is of course the man who banned and insulted legitimate patients' views on nhsexposed.com. Of course, to him these aren't "real people" according to Neil. We ask Neil whether he has had any access to patients over the last few years? Does he really care about patients? What has he ever done in his entire life to support patient rights? Those of us who know Neil's antics are aware that he "uses" patients to further "his business". He abuses their "data" to further his business. The reason he comments in the media is to " make money". People don't actually think he is doing this for the public good do they?

As Witchdoctor points out, your barn door physicians cannot even be found on iwantgreatcare.org. The majority are dead anyway.

The BBC are therefore propagating a website the GMC defined as " UNTESTED". Ummm risky moves Aunty Beeb! It is a bit like all the distorted reporting on medical issues.

Clearly, they like to live dangerously. Seriously, who cares what Bacon is using patient data for eh?! Does anyone care? The BBC certainly has no intention of informing the public about the real risks of data processing.

The BBC have a rather cavalier attitude to a man currently investigated by the Information Commissioner. Just remember all you guys and gals, if the IC rules against Bacon, the GMC can move in because we know they take up Data Protection complaints from the GMC's antics in Leamington Spa plus GMC v Southall.

This by the way was a continuation of the "HYPE".