Medical Establishment Following the release of Dr Scot Jnr [who is now going to behave like a good little boy while continuing his expletives in private], I have been asked by various sectors of the UK whether I plan to continue the GMC complaint. No doubt Paice and Needham want to know the answer to this question. The answer of course is "YES", I shall continue with the complaint and welcome all defence union input. Following discussions with my fellow bloggers, we are all unanimous in this decision. I know the GMC well and no doubt they will wish to throw this complaint out but I am never withdrawing the complaint. Dr Scot Jnr may now be wimping all the way to theatre but there is a principle here to fight for - that principle is accountability for all those who abuse the rights of others.
Dr Scot Jnr.
Gagged for Good.
Dr Scot Jnr. Gagged for Good.
8 comments:
Very good. No accountability a starsi state.
Shame she considers herself familiar enough with the jobsworths to use first name terms. Do they reciprocate ? No. Did she get the idea from mellor ? Was she perhaps secretly jealous of mellor using first name terms ? Probably. Afterall, Dr Pal's all-consuming (and ultimatey hopeless) obsession with GMC injustice stretches way back to when she was a teenager writing frequent letters to the GMC about her doctor father.
Attention seeking again are you Anon
Having a personality disorder cannot be easy can it?
Although you think you are being deeply clever, Anonymous, in digging up putatively true old bones, nothing of what you say, anonymous has any impact on RP's approach to the GMC.
Even if your point about the long-standing "obsession" with GMC injustice were true, it does not cheapen the fight now. There is just a lot of muck to shovel.
Your comments regarding RP's use of first name terms is speculative and deeply immature, and again does little to further a counter-argument.
I propose you are a thoroughly banal individual, and anticipate further gossipy effluent which you promote as hard facts.
Dr Chris
I wouldn't worry, those with personality disorders often attention seek.
Penny Mellor of course does not have a personality disorder but does have a forensic report.
Her spectacular loss at the General Medical Council is Henshall v Southall - a 12 year case that has been paid by doctors subs. Must be a few million by now. Mellor has never come to terms with the fact that she is an unintelligent uneducated lady who has provided fictional content to the GMC for years. It is simply that I recognised it, told the GMC and the Attorney General about it. I doubt that anyone would be jealous of a ex criminal. Afterall, that is what Mellor is - an ex criminal.
There is no obsession with the GMC. I am a writer, I raise issues that are of interest to me - in the hope that the information will be useful to everyone.
I wrote to the GMC once as a teenager - that was to find out options to rehabilitate my father. The time after that was during the period 2004 when I called the GMC " incompetent".
I would say given the GMC's trailing me repeatedly - with 3 spectacularly vexatious complaints concerning my critical writing - who is obsessed with who?
Oh, and you don't get to beat the GMC in court without reading their material in detail. I am still the first person to have beaten the GMC [2004] in the civil courts since its inception. That isn't a fluke. It required hard work, research and knowing everything there is to know about the GMC.
I pay attention to detail. As for being on first name terms - I see nothing wrong with that. Mark and Jackie have been communicating with me since 2002.
Regards
Dr Rita Pal
Oh Anon,
Just one more thing.
1. Each time you mention my dead father, we can return the favour
2. By favour, we can write about Mo Wilson. You do know her don't you?
3. Each time, you misbehave on either of our blogs implicating people, we can go back to Mo Wilson.
For avoidance of doubt, I do defend myself - very very well. During said defence I have no pity for anyone no matter who they are.
Dr Rita Pal
Anon
Oh dear, has it gone quiet in here?
Isn't it amusing enough to raise the subject of my dead father? Or has it become less amusing to raise the subject of the dying.
One could hear a pin drop in here!
RP
I suspect there's far more support for the Paice/Needham complaint than the pin-dropping silence here might suggest.
Ad hominem attacks and historic muck-raking (cf. Anon, 18 September 2008 03:38) are invariably the only resort of embittered folks who are not able to comprehend and engage in the wider perspectives and principles raised by such as the Dr Scot Jnr case raised.
Post a Comment